ME JUGGLING FOUR BALLS, AND ALSO EXPLAINING THE PORN COME OR "CUM" SHOT BY A MAN, ALL OVER A WOMAN'S FACE

A Keen, And Very Observant (Tocquevillian) Outsider
(And Hungry BTW)

Look, and please understand.


Today, we all live in an American, cowardly yellow submarine Society that rewards meaningless stuff like public game sports, and meaningless public entertainment put on by questionable, and less educated, and  jingoistic "Artists" such as Bruce Springsteen and Sylvester Stallone, and many others.


To put it another way, Jeter and Jordan get rich,and the American educated poor suffer silently, and in deep, deep debt for most of their adult lives.


That is a Crime Against Worldwide Humanity.


I blame the now fond and foolish, half doddering and senile Hippie Generation, in a lot of ways, for the creation and proliferation of the cum shot facial.


Anyway, we all get up and go to work in America everyday thinking that all the art forms, rewarded with unbelievable and extravagant wealth, such as pop music, and pop TV etc.  are the nuts. And, and or as Willie Stark might have said, we Americans brush it all off and say :  "Tough titties"  to those that think otherwise.


In the meantime, the debt indentured, educated people of this very same American Society at large that rewards all the garbage; that rewards uninformed and uneducated barbarism, but who also, along the way, somehow became educated...... thanks to the usury of a ruling class...


are extremely pissed off.


And more later, but as I say, my posts will be slowing down.


Anyway, I have a very good explanation for the cum shot all over a woman's face, because that is the English Literature major in me.


A very good explanation, I think, involving Steinbeck, and Carl Jung and others.


Too tired to write more for now.


And I will finish the extended warranty story, and the Allstate Interview story, as well as the Giant leprechaun etc etc.

______________________________________

I guess it was around 1986 or 1987 when I saw an X rated movie for the first time. Younger people may not know or understand that back in those days, people had to actually go to a movie theater to see a "Porn Flick." 

I was in College at the time, and hanging out at home on a Friday, or maybe it was Saturday, night with my brother and our mutual friend, Eddie. (Not his real name)

Anyway, the the three of us were looking at the local newspaper, The Long Island Newsday, and trying to decide what movie we were going to see that evening. 

Eddie, who in many ways, was a lot more sophisticated than my brother and myself, pointed to a small advertisement, somewhere on the periphery of the page,  for an X rated movie named  "Flashpants" or "Ginger Snaps" something or other and asked:

"Why don't we go see that?"

My brother and I were momentarily startled, for we had never seen an X rated film before, though we had heard about them. I was around 22 or 23 years old, and had, starting around the age of 10 or 11, and through the onset of puberty and adolescence , seen plenty of porn magazines such as Penthouse and Club International, and the somewhat less explicit Playboy.

In fact, a childhood friend that lived down the block used to steal his grandfather's copies of Penthouse magazine, and keep them in a wooden box which was buried under the boughs of a very mature and dense Rhodedendron hedge, where my friend and I, and another companion would look at the picures of naked women, and read the "dirty" stories in the Penthouse forum.

I suppose that compared to the Porn of today, those old Penthouse magazines were pretty tame, but still, it was enough to put me in the manly state, even though I was still a young boy, and somewhat curious and confused by the pictures. And my friend from down the block would remark: "Look at her!" And then ask: "Would you Fuck her?"

He would ask this over and over, and since I was confused, as I say, since I had only a vague notion of what "Fucking" a girl meant, I would sometimes remain silent. But if my friend persisted, I would say "No", and then my friend would follow up with:

"What do you mean No? What are you, A Homo?" Or "What are you, a Faggot?"

I recall that in the 1970's,  the word or term "Faggot"  was very commonly used  by children as a pejorative, having nothing to do with sexual orientation, for children back then had no concept of homosexuality. 

But then again, that friend of my youth must have understood something about homosexuality, for as we viewed one naked picture after another, over and over he would ask: "Would you fuck her?"

And then call me a faggot if I said no. 

The other friend that made up our trio would, most times, say that he would indeed fuck just about every nude model he saw, but he sometimes temporized with the qualification: "....but I'd put a pillow over her face."

Now, if I can digress just a tiny bit. A child growing up in middle class or, as was the case with me, a somewhat upper middle class America during the 1970's, quite often heard and used the word: "Faggot" or in it's contracted form "Fag" , It was meant more to denote...well...call it a quality of being a sissy.....which was understood to be synonymous with non-bravery or cowardice or, perhaps hesitancy, and not something to do with sexual orienrtation. For as I say, most children did not hear much about homosexuality, let alone understand it.

So when Ann Coulter called John Edwards a "Faggot" a few years back, I think it slipped out. 

It caused much outcry in the media, but I really feel that I understand how Ann Coulter came to use the word, given what I have tried to relate above.

Another term or word that was used very often, but has now disappeared from colloquial use was: "Psych!"  Psych was a sort of taunt. Kind of like saying "HA HA" at the failed efforts of another, or a spontaneous utterance expressing a sort of satisfaction at having, well, intimidated another during a competition. For instance, Schwarzenegger, in the movie "Pumping Iron" kept trying to "Psych out" Lou Ferrigno and Ferrigno's father,  and with great success. Arnold didn't use the word "Psych" but it was the same notion or idea.  But I'm going too far afied here and to return.

Now, back in 1976 or 1977, when I amd my two young companions sat within the Rhododendron hedge and read Penthouse or some other similar magazine, I also saw, for the first time, depictions of two women naked together and apparently making love. 

That confused me as well, since, being only 11 or 12 years old, I had no frame of reference or context for what I was viewing. And my friend, the one who was fond of calling others a faggot, knew not concept, let alone the word: "lesbian".  But there the pictures were. 

Which brings to mind something Sigmund Freud wrote in "Civilization and it's Discontents" and toi very roughly paraphrase off the cuff, something about a society having much less of a problem with lesbianism than with male homosexuality, which is of a different nature and therefore more of a closet ot taboo topic.

That is a rough paraphrasing as I say, and also I would add in the same off the cuff manner, that Freud said that one of the reasons male homosexuality is more of a taboo topic is because it is the male that dominates and runs a society.

Anyway, I'll leave off here, and try and get some sleep. it is almost 5AM.

I will add and edit all this as necessary, and lead up to the cum shot material etc.

I think these topics should be discussed openly, and not just by feminists that share their scholarship with a select few in Universities. 

Porn is a huge industry, and one must ask why that is so, and why this society rewards the makers of Porn with such wealth, and at the same time places educated people in deep debt for life.

I happen to know someone who has a "Fuck Shop" or an Adult video store. In one sense, it is a business, just like any other business, and this person says that he often gives out advice to the customers that walk in. Kind of like a Dr. Ruth. 

Anyway, just so that people do not think I am totally nuts, the gist of my theme here Re: the cum shot is that it is a sterile act. The penis is removed from the entrance to the womb (the source of  Human Life), and the seeds are wasted in a disrespectful and insulting way.

The agrarian, female earth goddess/mother archetype is violated by the cum shot facial, and therefore the fields are barren and the soil (society)  bears no fruit (education or knowledge)

And I will draw the connections and elaborate and explain more as I work on this story.

Steinbeck comes into play as well with this theme (Grapes of Wrath) as in, among other passages from the novel, when Rose of Sharon offers her breast to the man dying of starvation, and gives him her life sustaining milk, which is a far cry from the cum shot facial. 

And of course Joseph Campbell (The Power of Myth) and Professor Allan Bloom come into play, and Alexis De Tocqueville, whom I am going to read a bit from now as I try to gt a little sleep. 

Early EarthGoddess/Mother/Female Archetype

The Liberal Hippie, Baby Boomer ,

Counterculture Manifesto: It's A Cookbook!

See @ 1:39




And this is just to annoy that critic that can't help coming back to read my blog: